Our Resilience Narratives—the stories we tell about our hardest moments—shape who we become. Psychologist Dan McAdams calls these redemption and contamination narratives: one transforms suffering into wisdom. The other lets pain define identity , often manifesting as a persistent ‘chip on the shoulder’ —an inner narrative whispering that you are ‘not good enough’ and must constantly prove yourself. The same event can create either story, depending on our mindset. A reflective, growth-oriented outlook fuels redemption and learning. A fear-based mindset hardens pain into helplessness. Understanding these narrative patterns reveals why some people stretch and grow after adversity while others snap and wither. This is the quiet architecture of Learned Resilience—where meaning transforms challenge into strength.

This page explores the science of these stories and also provides a practical Leader’s Field Guide for stewarding them in your team.

The Science and Structure of Resilience Narratives

Psychologist Dan McAdams’ research on narrative identity revealed that how we organize life events into stories has measurable effects on mental health and resilience. He found two recurring arcs that appear across cultures and life stages: redemption narratives, in which negative experiences give rise to positive outcomes or growth; and contamination narratives, in which positive experiences are reinterpreted through loss, betrayal, or failure. These aren’t abstract patterns — they are the architecture of how the mind metabolizes experience.

In McAdams’s studies, people who told redemption stories — where adversity led to greater wisdom, compassion, or purpose — consistently scored higher in measures of well-being, hope, and generativity. Their brains and bodies reflected integration rather than fragmentation. In contrast, contamination narratives correlated with rumination, shame, and identity diffusion, where the self becomes trapped in an unfinished story. The sequence of events matters less than the interpretive lens that turns those events into either coherence or collapse.

This same dynamic is reflected in the THRIVE Loop of Learned Resilience. Each cycle — Trigger, Halt, Reflect, Integrate, Validate, and Engage — mirrors the narrative process of transforming adversity into meaning. When a person halts and reflects, they interrupt the contamination arc before it becomes identity. Integration and validation provide the redemptive turn — the moment when pain is re-contextualized as growth. Engagement completes the loop, reintroducing the self (or team) into the world with a renewed sense of coherence. The THRIVE Loop operationalizes what McAdams described: the deliberate act of authoring redemption rather than unconsciously reliving contamination.

The Mindset Behind Your Resilience Narrative

Psychologist Carol Dweck describes two basic orientations toward challenge: the fixed mindset and the growth mindset. A fixed mindset assumes our abilities and worth are static—success confirms them, and failure threatens them. A growth mindset, by contrast, views ability and identity as evolving—failure becomes feedback, and challenge becomes a teacher. These underlying beliefs quietly determine how we interpret our experiences.

Placed beside Dan McAdams’s work on redemption and contamination narratives, the parallels are striking.

  • A growth mindset naturally fuels a redemption narrative: setbacks become chapters of learning and transformation.
  • A fixed mindset reinforces a contamination narrative. This is the voice of an Inner Saboteur, an internal critic that whispers doubts and fears. As Theodore Roosevelt’s ‘Man in the Arena’ speech highlights, the external critic only has power when it triggers these inner voices.

Where McAdams focuses on the structure of our life stories, Dweck focuses on the psychology that guides their tone. Together, they reveal why two people facing the same event can emerge with radically different identities—one expanded, one diminished.

Inside the THRIVE Loop, mindset determines whether reflection leads to redemption or rumination. This stage is the practice of Transfomational Inquiry. Instead of ruminating, we use Transformational Questions —Reflective, Expansive, and Liberating —to consciously understand the saboteur’s narrative and author a new one.

  • With a growth mindset, the Reflect and Integrate stages create meaning and coherence.
    • With a fixed mindset, reflection turns into self-criticism, and integration collapses before completion.

The loop either becomes a spiral upward toward resilience or a looping replay of helplessness.
Every turn through THRIVE is therefore more than behavioral—it’s narrative editing at the level of identity, where mindset dictates authorship.


The THRIVE Loop: A Practical Map for Building Resilience Narratives

The Learned Resilience framework centers on a cyclical process called the THRIVE Loop — a pattern for transforming adversity into strength. It unfolds through six phases: Tackle, Hypothesize, Reach, Inspect, Value, and Energize.

Rather than denying challenge or pushing through it, THRIVE teaches us to metabolize experience — to pause, examine, and rewrite the meaning we give to difficulty before moving forward.

When we place Carol Dweck’s and Dan McAdams’s research alongside this loop, the synergy becomes clear. Dweck’s mindsets describe the internal stance we bring to challenge, while McAdams’s narratives describe the story form that stance produces. The THRIVE Loop, in turn, provides the practice structure that allows either pattern to complete or collapse.


How the THRIVE Loop Builds a Redemption Narrative, Step-by-Step

At the heart of Learned Resilience lies the THRIVE Loop—six repeatable phases that describe how the brain, body, and story respond to challenge.
Each phase invites a choice between two internal positions: growth or fixed mindset, redemption or contamination narrative.
The same event can trace two very different arcs through this loop.


T – Tackle: Name the Challenge

Facing a problem begins the story.

  • A growth mindset names the challenge as a catalyst. This act of framing initiates a redemption narrative: “Something meaningful can emerge from this.”
  • A fixed mindset sees the problem as threat or proof of limitation—contamination begins here.
    Tackling on with awareness engages norepinephrine’s alerting system; focus rises when we shift from avoidance to authorship.

H – Hypothesize: Choose One Atomic Step

Here, mindset dictates scale.

  • Growth asks, What’s one small move I can test?
  • Fixed asks, What’s the point?
    A growth stance releases dopamine in anticipation of learning; a fixed stance constricts imagination.
    This is the first narrative fork—do we write a story of agency or paralysis?

R – Reach: Act with Heart

Action reveals belief.

  • A growth mindset acts with curiosity, letting adrenaline sharpen attention while passion fuels purpose.
  • A fixed mindset acts defensively or not at all, bracing for confirmation of failure.
    The redemption arc expands identity through engagement; the contamination arc tightens it through fear.

I – Inspect: Evaluate the Step

Meaning crystallizes in reflection.

  • Growth turns evaluation into learning—dopamine marks new pathways of understanding.
  • Fixed turns it into self-critique—cortisol sustains stress without insight.
    This is the interpretive hinge of the loop: redemption narratives reinterpret outcomes as data; contamination narratives treat them as verdicts.

V – Value: Extract and Integrate Learning

Here the story matures.

  • Growth integrates insight, weaving coherence: “This taught me something.”
  • Fixed loops in rumination: “This proved my limits.”
    Serotonin steadies the system as learning takes hold—physiology mirrors narrative completion.

E – Energize: Recover and Re-enter

Recovery is where resilience becomes renewable.

  • Growth rests with gratitude and readiness—closing the redemption sequence.
  • Fixed collapses into exhaustion or cynicism—replaying contamination.
    As cortisol lowers and serotonin and oxytocin rise, the nervous system encodes the lesson as safety, not threat.

The Pattern Beneath the Process

In every cycle, mindset shapes meaning, and meaning shapes memory.
McAdams showed that people who tell redemption stories become more hopeful and connected.
Dweck showed that people with growth mindsets learn faster and rebound sooner.
The THRIVE Loop is where those two truths meet: it is the mechanism by which mindset becomes story and story becomes strength.


How the THRIVE Loop Generalizes a Redemption Narrative

Resilience is rarely all or nothing. It moves through us in waves — fierce in one moment, fragile in another. Psychologists call this situational variability, the way our capacity to adapt fluctuates depending on stress, environment, and meaning. Yet beneath that, there’s a subtler truth: resilience can fragment across life vectors. We may be courageous at work and lost in love, disciplined in sport yet defeated in spirit.

Even those who seem unbreakable carry hidden fractures. Achilles, the mythic warrior, was felled by his heel — not his strength. The lesson isn’t that heroes fail, but that every strength leaves a shadow somewhere else. Our vulnerabilities are not moral defects; they are untrained domains where story, biology, and circumstance haven’t yet found coherence.

Children in East Africa smiling and playing, representing joy, resilience, and hope despite scarcity.
Even where life seems harshest, joy can thrive — proof that resilience begins not in abundance, but in spirit.

Lessons from Tanzanian Children

When I visited East Africa with CARE, I met a man sitting on a curb in Dar es Salaam with his young son. The boy wore cutoff shorts, his only clothing, and clutched an empty two-liter bottle — his only possession. By day, it was his soccer ball; by night, his teddy bear that he cuddled with. And yet the child’s joy was radiant — alive, unguarded, contagious. It was a moment of dissonance. Back in the classroom, my students listened with fascination as they saw the pictures of these kids that had so little and yet were so visibly happy.

That scene revealed something essential about resilience: that it can hide in narrow places, like light through a crack. Even when life feels barren across every dimension, one small vector — a relationship, a ritual, a glimmer of hope — can serve as a bootstrap. Pulling on that slender thread doesn’t just lift that domain; it can lift the whole. The nervous system doesn’t compartmentalize meaning forever. Hope in one area can prime the chemistry of courage in another.

This is the art of Learned Resilience: discovering that repair seldom begins where we think it should. Sometimes the doorway to healing a broken life domain opens through another that is still whole — the joy of a child, the love of a friend, a moment of mastery, or a breath that feels safe again. The THRIVE Loop gives us a map for that movement: the journey from fracture to coherence, from despair to authorship.


How the THRIVE Loop Bootstraps Strength Across Domains

Portrait of Achilles in armor, symbolizing that even the strongest have hidden vulnerabilities.
Even the great Achilles has a weak spot — strength without awareness can still break.

Each turn through the THRIVE LoopTackle, Hypothesize, Reach, Inspect, Value, Energize — is a neurochemical and narrative rehearsal in recovery. It’s not confined to one life vector. When we move through the loop successfully in one area, the physiological memory of completion (dopamine, serotonin, oxytocin) becomes transferable fuel. In neuroscience, this process is called generalization: our brain learns the pattern of resolution and can redeploy it elsewhere.

For instance, a person who regains agency through exercise (Reach) may find that energy spills into creative work or relationship repair (Engage). Similarly, a student who reframes academic failure (Inspect → Value) can find new empathy and patience with themselves in social setbacks. Every small redemptive cycle becomes a microdose of coherence — a reminder that growth is possible, not theoretical.

That’s what the boy with the bottle was embodying. His play — a single act of joy with a makeshift toy — was a THRIVE loop in miniature. Tackle: a world without toys. Hypothesize: “This bottle could be one.” Reach: kick it. Inspect: it rolls. Value: that’s fun. Energize: repeat. That simple loop was enough to give him mastery, agency, and belonging in a world that offered little else.

If he could bootstrap hope from an empty bottle, what else might we reclaim from the fragments of our own lives?


FFrom ‘Me’ to ‘We’: Sharing the Redemption Narrative

The We Loop extends that same truth into community. One person’s completed cycle of meaning — a redemptive narrative — can seed resilience in others. When shared, it activates collective coherence: “If you found strength there, maybe I can too.” Teams, families, and cultures metabolize adversity through these shared loops.

In organizations, this is how psychological safety becomes more than a buzzword. A team that learns together to halt before blame, reflect without shame, and extract value from difficulty begins to build narrative capital — the collective equivalent of muscle memory. One person’s redemption arc becomes another’s blueprint for hope.

Across a village, a company, or a classroom, resilience spreads not through slogans but through modeled loops of transformation. Each story told with authenticity becomes a bootstrap for the next person’s climb.


The Artistry of Repair: Kintsugi and the Resilience Narrative

Learned Resilience and Kin
Every fracture can become a seam of gold — resilience turns damage into design.

Even those who seem unbreakable carry hidden fractures. Yet, as the Japanese art of Kintsugi teaches, fracture need not be flaw — it can be the canvas for transformation. Kintsugi, the practice of repairing broken pottery with veins of gold, reveals that what was once broken can become more beautiful for having been mended.

In this way, Kintsugi mirrors the practice of Learned Resilience. Each break represents disruption or loss. Each repair symbolizes reflection, learning, and renewal. And the gold — shimmering in the seams — embodies the wisdom gained through adversity.

Every scar tells a story. Every repair line is a record of courage. Resilience, like Kintsugi, is not about returning to what was; it’s about becoming something new — something stronger, more luminous, and more whole because of what has been endured.


Collective Resilience Narratives: How the ‘We Loop’ Creates Shared Growth

Resilience does not end with the individual. Once one person’s story begins to shift from fracture to meaning, others around them feel it. A single redemption narrative can seed collective renewal. In the language of Learned Resilience, this is the domain of the We Loop—the shared process through which teams, families, or communities metabolize adversity together.

Where the THRIVE Loop transforms an individual’s challenge into growth, the We Loop applies the same principles to the group’s shared field. A setback, conflict, or crisis becomes a communal “Tackle.” Collective curiosity replaces blame, hypotheses are co-created, and shared actions (“Reach”) begin to rebuild coherence. When groups Inspect outcomes together, extract Value, and Energize through acknowledgment and celebration, they don’t just repair function—they renew trust and identity.

In this process, collective narratives mirror individual ones.

  • Teams guided by a growth mindset co-author redemption narratives: “We faced it, learned, and emerged stronger.”
  • Groups caught in a fixed mindset default to contamination narratives: “This happened because we failed, and it will happen again.”

The difference lies in whether shared reflection is used to assign blame or to build meaning. The We Loop turns fragmented experiences into a story of us—one that links adversity to adaptation rather than alienation. In that shared story, resilience becomes cultural: the way a system remembers, recovers, and reimagines itself after stress.

For those leading teams, reflection must eventually become practice. The following field guide distills the art of narrative stewardship into a set of tangible moves—simple habits that help leaders keep their teams aligned with a redemptive arc when pressure mounts and stories begin to fray.


Leader’s Field Guide: How to Steward Resilience Narratives

A practical companion to the section above. Use these nine moves to keep the team’s story on a redemptive arc.

1. First, learn to see the stories (diagnose before you direct)

  • Listen for arc, not just facts: trending bad→good (redemption) or good→bad (contamination)?
  • Fixed tells: “always/never,” identity labels, blame, rumor spirals.
  • Growth tells: specificity, next steps, curiosity, feedback requests.
  • Surface the plot: “Chapter title now?” → “Chapter title we want?”

2. Use language that tips the arc toward redemption

  • Swap verdicts → variables: “What did we learn?” > “Who messed up?”
  • Shrink scope: “In this scenario…” > “We’re bad at…”
  • Time-box the miss: “So far… until now… next time we will…”
  • Name the gain: “What skill did this build?”

3. Map leadership moves to the THRIVE Loop (team-level)

  • Tackle: co-author a crisp, right-sized problem statement.
  • Hypothesize: one testable next action; no multi-front heroics.
  • Reach: protect focus; clear crosswinds and noise.
  • Inspect: short, blame-free after-action: worked / surprised / change.
  • Value: capture a one-sentence “elixir” and make it visible.
  • Energize: acknowledge effort; schedule the next right-sized Tackle.

4. Build rituals that keep redemption sticky

  • Narrative debrief (15m): Signal, Surprise, Shift.
  • Shared memory map: challenges → hypotheses → outcomes → elixirs.
  • Recovery micro-rituals: quick stand-down + appreciation; celebrate learning.

5. Antidotes to contamination (when the story slides)

  • Interrupt globalizing: “This incident ≠ our identity.”
  • Re-anchor agency: “What’s in our control this week?”
  • Re-specify harm: name + repair; separate accountability from identity.
  • Rebalance the ledger: 3 counterexamples to any absolute claim.

6. Environment design: make the redemptive path the easy path

  • Short loops: smaller bets, faster feedback, visible learning.
  • Psych safety with standards: high candor + high care.
  • Evidence over opinion: light metrics answer “did the hypothesis help?”
  • Leaders go first: model your own T→H→R→I→V→E publicly.

7. When harm is real (stories alone aren’t enough)

  • Acknowledge + repair: apologies with action; redemption ≠ denial.
  • Restore capacity: redistribute load, add margin, pause if needed.
  • Invite outside mirrors: neutral facilitation for hot debriefs.

8. Signals you’re shifting the narrative

  • More “we learned…”; fewer “we failed because…”.
  • Hypotheses get smaller; time-to-insight shrinks.
  • People volunteer to try again sooner.
  • Postmortems produce playbook updates, not posturing.

9. A one-week activation plan (lightweight, high-leverage

  • Mon: name one team Tackle; 2-sentence problem statement.
  • Tue: agree on a single Hypothesis; assign one owner.
  • Wed–Thu: Reach with focus; leader clears obstacles.
  • Fri AM: Inspect (15m): Signal / Surprise / Shift.
  • Fri PM: Value / Energize: publish the elixir; gratitude round; schedule next Tackle.

10. Leader to apply the “Gentle Jost”

Interrupt the spiral with a Gentle Jolt. Ask a provocative question that surfaces the hidden story, such as, ‘What are you pretending not to know?’ or ‘What’s the cost of staying loyal to that story?’

Resilient leadership is, at its core, the practice of tending to stories—our own and those we share. Frameworks and rituals matter, but what transforms teams is not process alone; it’s presence. Leaders who stay attuned to the unfolding story of their people help turn uncertainty into coherence, setbacks into meaning, and performance into purpose. Over time, this quiet narrative stewardship becomes culture itself—the lived expression of Learned Resilience in action.


Coda: Your Resilience Narrative as a Living Story

Every act of resilience is, at its heart, an act of storytelling. We face what breaks us, we make sense of it, and we decide what it means. Some choose stories of loss and contamination—where pain defines identity. Others choose stories of growth and redemption—where pain becomes the raw material of wisdom. Both are human; the difference lies in awareness.

The THRIVE Loop gives us a way to practice that awareness—to see the pattern and work with it rather than be carried by it. The We Loop extends that same discipline to our relationships, teams, and cultures, reminding us that resilience isn’t only what we do alone; it’s what we build together.

At every level—personal, professional, collective—resilience depends on how we frame the narrative moment we’re in. When leaders help people see their own stories as evolving rather than finished, when teams reflect together instead of assigning blame, the future reopens. Redemption becomes possible not because the past is erased, but because it’s finally integrated.

Resilience, then, is not the absence of fracture; it’s the artistry of repair.
Every loop, every story, every challenge metabolized into meaning adds another thread to that tapestry. And in time, we discover that Learned Resilience is less a skill we master than a story we keep retelling—a living narrative of becoming whole again and again.


See Also

  • Learned Resilience: Beyond Grit — What It Is and How to Build It
    The foundational framework behind the THRIVE and We Loops — a neuropsychological and leadership-based approach to transforming adversity into growth.
  • Saboteurs and Allies
    Saboteurs and Allies are the opposing inner voices that shape how we think, feel, and act. Saboteurs are negative, self-sabotaging thought patterns that create stress and hold us back. Allies are positive inner strengths that counter these patterns and help us grow, connect, and achieve our goals.
  • Powerful Questions and Active Listening
    A practical guide to Transformational Inquiry and Active Listening. This document provides the “how-to” for rewriting a narrative, offering specific Transformative Questions (Reflective, Expansive, and Liberating) to help individuals and teams interrupt a saboteur’s contamination story and consciously author a new, redemptive one.
  • Mindset: The New Psychology of Success – Carol Dweck
    Explores how growth and fixed mindsets shape learning, achievement, and our interpretations of failure — concepts directly mirrored in Resilience Narratives.
  • Powerful Questions and Active Listening
    Powerful Questions and Active Listening enable more meaningful, effective and mindful one-on-one conversations.
  • The Redemptive Self: Stories Americans Live Dan P. McAdams
    Northwestern University psychologist Dan P. McAdams introduced the concepts of redemption and contamination narratives, showing how the stories we tell about our lives shape our identity, purpose, and resilience. His work on narrative identity bridges psychology and meaning-making, illuminating why some people transform adversity into growth while others feel diminished by it.
  • Posttraumatic Growth: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Evidence – Richard Tedeschi & Lawrence Calhoun
    Seminal work demonstrating how trauma can catalyze psychological and moral growth — the scientific underpinning of redemption narratives.
  • Daring Greatly – Brené Brown
    Illuminates the role of vulnerability and shame resilience in courageous leadership and collective healing — essential for leaders stewarding redemption narratives.
  • Weathering Storms: The Sikh Art of Chardi Kala
    A complementary reflection on spiritual resilience — how hope and optimism are sustained through adversity.
  • Kintsugi and Learned Resilience
    A poetic metaphor for redemption — how cracks, when mended with gold, create beauty stronger than the original form.